The Newest Version of Welcome to the Meritoc[u]racy

1.  Why sharing ideas that matter, matters

We built to make it easy and rewarding to share ideas that matter.

Ideas matter: they make all of us, individuals, businesses and societies, progress. Sharing ideas is equally important as creating them: it honors the creators; it enriches the recipients; and it also benefits the “passers”, who enhance their reputation through propagation of wisdom.

In today’s web, that’s what curators do: they discover, enrich and share content. When they do it well – with passion and expertise and with all due respect to the authors, they make the web a better place and are consequently, quite rightly, rewarded. They, as individuals or as businesses, shine on the web!

So we built to make it easy and rewarding to share ideas that matter. And you, our great community of curators, have embraced the concept at large; you elevated from a clever publishing solution to an active community of savvy people who together make the web a better place. You have indexed, organized, edited and published more than 50 million pieces of content, attracting an audience of nearly 80 million unique visitors. You demonstrated that sharing ideas that matter matters; and is, indeed, rewarding.

2.  A humanrithm-powered influence upgrade

But you also challenged us — and we love it 🙂

You wanted to make it even easier to discover relevant content; to organize content in a more meaningful way; to connect with people who share your interests.

So we worked together, with our specialists group on Google+, with our power users, collecting hundreds of suggestions, testing and exchanging ideas. We are really grateful and impressed by your involvement. Together we designed this new major release that enables merit-based organization of web content and helps great curators shine even more on the web.

But how to organize content on a meaningful way? Considering the sheer amount of content at stake, we could not do it manually. We needed algorithms: uses a Big Data semantic algorithm to analyze content, to identify “meaning” within your curation.

But as much as we trust robots to help you find content (’s engine suggests content), we do not trust robots to publish or organize content for you (on, you decide what’s published). We believe in humanrithm — robots working together with humans.

3.  Interest channels

The first major feature in this release are the interest channels: that’s categories in which the best topics are organized. Interest channels enable interest-based discovery.

How do we build these channels? By means of the humanrithm: when your curation reaches a certain quality score (based on activity, freshness and engagement) our algorithm invites you to categorize it into an interest channel (the algorithm even suggests possible channels, based on semantic analysis).

These channels enable effective navigation along the interest graph. They help you find relevant content and curators.

And when your topic eventually becomes part of an interest channel, its shining power increases dramatically!

How do we then organize these channels? How do we make sure they make sense? Enter peer recommendation.

4.  #Curatethecurators

When one of your topics becomes eligible to join an interest channel, you are rewarded with additional power: The power to recommend other curator’s topics!

Recommending a topic contributes to its quality score. It helps it grow toward an interest channel! And of course, topics in the channels are also sorted by quality score (you’ll see silver and golden badges attached to the best topics). Recommending a topic makes it shine even more!

By being a great curator you earn the power to recommend other topics; and by doing so, you contribute to a merit-based organization of web content.

5.  You told us! is not a place where random users trick scoring algorithms by posting “lol cat pictures” or “twerking videos.” is a place where passionate people, savvy professionals, and serious businesses come to discover, enrich and publish ideas that matter; for their visibility and for their reputation.

Moving toward a merit-based organization was only natural. That was written into our DNA — our core values. And that’s what you told us you needed. 🙂

Discovery of relevant content, connections with people who share your interests and increased visibility based on your merit: all of this benefits the curators, you.

So don’t be shy: use your power, shine; and #curatethecurators!


For the exact details about what’s new with this release, check out our knowledge base article here.

Rate this post: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

  • NotHappyAboutAndroidApp

    And when do we get to do that on the go ? with a decent android app that allows tagging for example ? or a CSS that allows us to do it via the web while the app is being written ? Just asking

    • Marc Rougier

      Hello! There are three apps for on the go: iPad, iPhone and Android. The iPad is a full blown curation + discovery app. Admittedly, the iPhone and Android apps are (still) very basic. Lately, after the release of the iPad app, we have focused our forces on this new release (with lots of interaction with the community so it took time and effort and hopefully you’ll like it :)). But your point is totally valid and is taken. Must Do! Thanks for your feed back.

      • konterkariert

        Hi Marc,

        the main problem for me – why I don’t share much much more on to my “future” topic (that leveled up to ‘gold’) – is that I have no quick and easy option to do so Post-PC. That’s why I currently focus 90% of my sharing time on other platforms, such as Flipboard.

        As background: I’m mainly in news discovery mode when using my iPhone apps and in work mode when at my PC (where I don’t like to open while working).

        – With the current iPhone app I can’t even re-scoop an article that I like. I would expect that a long press on an article from someone else (or another gesture) on would allow me to easily rescoop something. But no.

        – I can easily share to Buffer via their Email feature (
        – I can easily share to Pocket via their Email feature (
        – And I can save something to Evernote via their Email feature (
        – But no. Not possible to share something to a predefined topic on I use this for Buffer all the time, to share from any iOS news app on my iPhone to the outside world – because Email is the lowest common feature at least available in each app (as you know sharing data on iOS is very very very horrible limited in contrast to Android – the least you can do is sharing by email, that is the minimum of each news app there).

        All said, there is no way for me to share a highly interesting news article to as of now. On iOS there is no sharing function available at all, I can’t directly share from Zite or Prismatic or Riversip or whatever app to the app (because of Apple). And I can’t indirectly share a link from such news apps to (because of your missing Email feature). So I’m stuck and just update my topic 1-2 times per week. And haven’t started any new topics.

        P.S. I’m really a passionate user of sharing tools. I may have even influenced your decision to introduce the “rescoop” function some years ago. I was a very early Tumble user and liked their “reblog” very much, so I told someone of your team in your feedback area, that I don’t see any point in using as long as you don’t offer a similar function, got a reply that it sounded good – and some weeks later – the “re-scoop” was introduced 🙂 And I had the feeling this was the point when started to take off with user engagements.

        • Guillaume Decugis

          Hi Christoph –

          You’re right: Apple offers limited sharing possibilities (and iOS7 was actually disappointing for us on that point as they’re still not on par with Android on this).

          And you’re right that we don’t support send to email as a sharing mechanism for of course.

          But like you, I do a lot of content discovery on my iPhone and as a pretty fast workaround, I’ve used the copy/paste function of iOS. Most content apps allow you to “copy link” (or if not open in Safari where you can copy). From there on, it’s pretty fast to open the iPhone App and use our past feature (the + button). While I was using send-to-email sharing in Posterous, I found that this copy/paste workflow can work even faster for me.

          I’d love you to give it a try and tell us how it worked out!

          Thanks again for the feedback.

          • konterkariert

            The copy/paste function of iOS is so slow, but I’ll give it a try. I hope you can add send-to-email sharing soon as a feature.

            BTW: How can it happen, that I my topic ( had ‘gold’ status 7 days ago, when I wrote my comment here and mentioned it in the first sentences, quote: “Why I don’t share much much more on to my “future” topic (that leveled up to ‘gold’)”.

            And now my status is only ‘silver’ ? Has this been done by algorithms or humans?

          • Guillaume Decugis

            The logic here is that Gold status can’t be granted forever: these topics are supposed to be the best of the best and therefore this is not something that can be granted once and for all if we follow that rationale. Several factors are being considered for this: users can stop recommending a topic (we made the feature reversible as you may have noticed), our algorithms also has an input, etc… Having said that, we’re just at the beginning of this and like you and a few others pointed out, we’ve observed that our assessment method on this might not be optimized. Update on this in progress.

          • konterkariert

            Thanks for giving me these detailed insights, Guillaume. I guess I know what your algorithms noticed.

            Exactly in the time when you launched the new version with the new silver/gold curator status – I had no time to update my topic for about 8 days. And what made things worse, my last update had a picture that looked ugly and boring in the preview section of the “innovation” topic. Overall I know that I tend to post more boring “dry” stuff, which always gets much lower reactions, as I currently learn on my Flipboard magazine, which I guess has negative effects for my rankings on

            I’m totally fine with having a “silver status”. That is already an honor. I was only confused by the change without explanation to me, from getting directly to gold and then a week later ranked back to silver.

            P.S. It would be great if the curator could change which images shows up there: Currently is always the last added article, you have no choice to select a different one that may look better, if the current image of your own topic looks horrible:

  • Ian Wright

    Well this is great! Thanks for the kudos of being “incredibly highly-recommended”. Hopefully it’ll lead to more people discovering us 🙂

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks Ian!

      That’s exactly the purpose! When you recommend others, you contribute to making the web a better place, by using your human values to complement algorithm-based ranking.

      And when you are recommended, your visibility increases and you can be discovered by more people – and not any people, but people who care about the interest you are curating about.

      This we hope is to the benefit of great content and great curators; merit-based visibility. That’s why we encourage you to keep curating and be recommended. And to #curatethecurators!

  • Laurence Veya

    Please, deliver soon a French traduction of and simplify the webpage so that the non initiate users of can use it easily…

    • Marc Rougier

      Bonjour Laurence,

      Nous serions ravis, vous vous en doutez, de pouvoir maintenir une version française de Et même dans d’autres langues (nous avons de nombreux utilisateurs hispanophones par exemple). Malheureusement nous sommes encore une jeune startup et devons concentrer nos ressources sur la valeur la plus générale; concernant la langue, sur le web, c’est bien sûr l’anglais. Mais la traduction en français est dans nos plans! Et d’ici là, si vous avez des questions ou problèmes spécifiques, nous pouvons vous assister en ligne, et en français!

      Merci pour votre intérêt,


      • Laurence Veya

        Hello, je comprends bien que votre budget ne vous permette pas de traduire pour l’instant…aussi je vous recommande mettre simplement une boussole au lieu de Find par exemple et de remplacer par des symboles la navigation de car je remarque que les non-initiés sont très vite déboussolés et quittent scoopit rapidement alors que moi j’adhère complètement à votre vision. Je fais même maintenant une redirection 301 depuis mon nom de domaine…car je crois en vous

        Meilleures salutations

        *Laurence Veya*
        *Rue de la paix 62 *
        *2740 Moutier*
        *Tel. 0041795315288*

        Le 3 octobre 2013 01:10, Disqus a écrit :

  • Karl Steinmeyer

    Nicely done.

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks Karl!

  • FrenchNewsonlin

    Impressive upgrade Marc and thanks for making it easier to find communities of similar interests. Scoopit has proved a very useful tool for us.

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks a lot. We value your feed back.


  • Stephen Kirk

    Guys – love what you’re doing – can we have a membership tier between pro and business [?Pro+] that allows us to brand as an individual curator (ie our own visual id) still with limited topics… the hike between pro and biz is pretty steep…

    • Marc Kneepkens

      Totally agree.

    • Marc Rougier

      Stephen, Marc,

      Thanks for the positive words on

      Thanks also for the suggestion. We are constantly reviewing our users needs and we know that one size doesn’t fit all needs. Having an intermediate package with branding is certainly an interesting value proposition. Point taken! Please do not hesitate to continue the discussion if you have any other ideas which would make better for you.



    Good update, nice try

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks! And we will keep trying!

  • DIVIES Naima

    Great, nice and easy to use! Bravo!

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks much. Our community pushes us forward 🙂

    • DIVIES Naima

      HI Marc,
      I plan to get the business package related to Scoop it services

      Before that I would like to check various points
      1- I plan to have between 5 to 10 topics for a private use (dedicated to internal use – employers)
      2- the second part, we would like to have a public Scoop it (from 2 to 5 topics dedicated to our parteners, customers)).

      Is it possible to have these two services in the same subscription?
      Thanks for your advice.

  • Álvaro Ricárdez

    I like the idea of creating interest channels! It would facilitate searches and it will increase productivity! Great work!

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks Alvaro,

      We really like your feed back. And because Interest Channels facilitate searches, they also, consequently, increase visibility: it’s really a two way discovery benefit. So it should be valuable for any curator to make it to a channel!


  • martiz

    Just Love Congrats for a job Well Done Developers
    Keep Up the Good Work Marti Zuidam

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks for sharing the love Marti.

      Yes we are lucky to have awesome team of developers!

      Nice topic on more than mountains 🙂


  • Steve Freeman

    Being new to I am pleased with the interaction. I use the provided suggestions plus I will post articles written by authors I enjoy from my Linkedin group. I’ve got to say that when I comment that I have Scooped their article (I provide them a link) they get excited to see their post somewhere besides their blog. It is a great way to build authority for them and me.

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks much Steve,

      Building authority, demonstrating though leadership is really what’s at stake. Very glad to read that you see it work; hopefully with the new Interest Channels, we’ll enabling this even more (by facilitating discovery and connection with content and people relevant to your interest).

      Since I read that you are using the suggestion engine as well: do you know that you can fine-tune it, apply filters, etc, to make suggestions more relevant and increase the signal-to-noise ration? And of course, you also have the bookmarklet to easily capture content outside Do not hesitate to ask if it’s unclear.



  • konterkariert

    More feedback.

    Please add Zemanta to I guess you have never heard of Zemanta, but trust me, they could drastically change the experience of tagging to the better. And with more tags lead to even more visitors on

    You can test Zemanta if you have a wordpress blog with their plugin:

    And they have a quick and easy to use demo here that just takes 30 seconds to understand the potential:

    Zemanta is a semantic analysis engine. They can very quick identify the topics of any content. They are the best in what they do world-wide.

    • Marc Rougier

      Nice! Thanks for sharing.

      Not sure how / where we should add Zemanta to, but very interesting technology / product. I’ll try further!


  • tribeqa

    I think Scoop is great, but the reason I do not use it as much as I want is the simple fact that I cannot embed my pages in my own website. At least, not that I know about. Above you talk about sharing, curating social, curating the curator, amplifying it. All fantastic, but I want to share it with my own website an share the fruits of my ‘hard work’ with my website and embellish that too at the same time.
    I hope it can be done soon. Thanks Robert

  • Ante Lauc

    I agree with your vision, but it is much more difficult to create synergy at scoop, than I thought. We could become “learning organization” as Peter Senge initiated, but lack of warm hearts and smart minds diminish it.

  • Bhavik

    Finally comes with flat Ui. Well thats great but i found some color complications in “upgrade” button, notification icons , hope you will try other colors for that.. you can try world best flat ui designs
    for your inspiration

    • Marc Rougier

      Yes flat was a necessary move. For it’s today’s web. But also it’s somehow aligned with the values of curation: less is more 😉

      Colors are a difficult debate (there are rules and there are tastes). We AB tested several options, but thanks very much for sharing this interesting resource!


      • wyatte

        Agree about colours Marc, there are indeed rules. There are rules about text too. Rule Number 1 is that it should be clear and legible. As far as I know there’s no rule about it having to match the company logo (who cares?). The new GUI makes me wince each time I return to Scoop.It from the largely-legible-rest-of-the-world. Not a good user experience mate 🙁

        • Claire Allwood

          Thanks, wyatte, I was beginning to think I was the only one ‘wincing’. I actually checked all my browsers before realising that it wasn’t a problem with the browser rendering fonts incorrectly but an actual design decision. Really not pleasant. I wince every time I scoop as well. Very iOS7 (not downloading that one till I absolutely have to). I know looks aren’t everything but in a GUI they are important for a good experience. I am all for clean and simple, but it just doesn’t work for me.

          • wyatte

            You’re right Claire, the app graphics are clear as a bell, while the web site is total rubbish. How about that for a cross-platform service? BTW you’re right to ignore the app. Just tried it and the suggestions list on every one of my topics displays blank, even though I can see the listed items on the web version. Look, I’m convinced Scoop.It! has the potential to become seriously big but someone in there is sending it into a nose dive just when it should be soaring.

  • Catherine Fitzpatrick

    I’ve loved Scoopit and I found it really enhanced my blog and attracted Twitter followers. I spent a lot of time happily curating.

    But if I’ve understood you correctly, what you’re saying here is only those accounts that have attracted a sufficient amount of traffic (and it’s not clear how much) can be expected to be offered the chance to be boosted into the interest channel and get even more views. So it’s basically a way of making the power curve steeper and ultimately shaking loose the long tail people in very niche topics like some of mine.

    OK, understood, you have to find some way to curate the curators. Let me explain what has driven me away from here so that I can’t play that game with you as well as I used to: the User Interface.

    Ever since you changed the way items are scooped, and put the interface all the way over to the right, and used two sliders to try to move through the offerings, I’ve found it incredibly frustrating. I now have to pull down the sluggish slider — sometimes losing grip on it as you often do with those kind of sliders — and sometimes mix it up with the other slider next to it. I then have to try to pull up the scoop — but it doesn’t show in the browser window with its “scoopit button” so I have to struggle with the slider again to pull it down, put it in the view, and click it.

    In other words, I don’t have a smooth easy interface like Storyful, where I just drag and drop.

    And yes, I realize there are many readers who will say Works on My Machine, and the devs feel the UI issue is solved and they already have feedback from power users and they don’t need to hear from anyone else on this. But I’m telling you the usability of sliders and multiple forced clicks versus drag and drop as at Storyful is driving people away — you just won’t hear them tell you.

    Oh, how I wish you had drag and drop! It is very, very hard to stick with this service when the sliders make it so cumbersome and turn every transaction into multiple frustrating clicks.

    • Marc Rougier

      Hello Catherine,

      Thanks for taking the time to write such a comprehensive comment. And thanks for the nice words 🙂

      You address three points:

      – how does a topic become eligible to a channel
      – UX choice: drag & drop vs slider
      – Comparison with Storyful

      Let me briefly respond to each of them.

      On the eligibility to reach a channel, you misunderstood me. Sorry if I was not clear. We do NOT want topics to earn additional visibility just based on the fact that they already have visibility. This would actually be contrary to our values: our mission is also to help great curator attract an audience. The criteria to be eligible is based on various parameters, including your engagement as a curator (do you add insight or do you just bookmark? do you share? is your content fresh? etc), the engagement of your audience (do they comment, like, share what you do?) and, ultimately, human recommendations by your peers! Is it perfect? No! Are there some possible biases? Yes. But it’s a mix of objective data (and not only number of views) and human interaction. Knowing that only “active curators” can recommend, this is a reasonable, humanrithm-based and merit-based way to qualify a topic. And yes, we do need a criteria (hence, a potentially un-perfect criteria), to select which topics a channelworthy; otherwise channels will just be additional noise. Which would defeat the very objective of curation.

      On the UX to select from the suggested content, you have a good point. We actually A/B tested many options and this one won. We do not pretend that there is no better way (and there will further evolutions, of course). But there are pluses and minuses on each solution (how do you drag and drop from far away, or on mobile, etc). But I appreciate your feed back: some people like and other don’t; for us it’s about finding the best compromise, it’s not about dogma 🙂

      On comparison with Storyful. I think this would require a longer post, but there are some very substantial differences (DNA-level ;)): the nature of content you can find (order of magnitude is 10’s of thousands of real time data for Storyful I believe, vs 10’s of millions of any data for, the community (does not exist in Storyful, while it’s an additional opportunity to discover content and connect with peers in, the audience ( brings you an audience, including via the SEO performances of the pages), pricing points too… I’m not suggesting that is better, I’m suggesting that there are fundamental differences which makes it difficult to fully compare. And I appreciate that Storyful has valuable features and UX as well!

      Thanks again for your comment. Your first point is the most important one in the context of this particular release and I hope I clarified it. And will keep evolving.


  • yustein

    Good improvements but not enough. I would like to see changes to the pricing. Using your own domain shouldn’t be that expensive. That’s one of the reasons I’ve switched to Also again, there has to be an option for some level of automated article posting, at least give us the option to choose. Maybe a separate section which states auto collected scoops? And let us change the format of the display, for example from 2 columns to 3 columns.

    Before these changes, especially the pricing for using your own domain, I will have to continue to use

  • F2M

    Great idea!

    • Marc Rougier

      Idea born in our community of users 🙂 Thanks for your nice comment!

  • wyatte

    C’mon chaps,the new font’s gotta be one of the worst ever adopted! The buttons border on the illegible. Scoop.It! can do much, much better than this. We know you can. At the top of this screen it says “smart is the new sexy”. Get smart 😉

  • Shaun Ling

    i love!

    • Marc Rougier

      Thanks! This gives us lots of energy to forge ahead 🙂

  • Guillaume Dumortier

    ✮✮✮✮✮ Loving all the updates. Lovin’ it.

    • Marc Rougier

      Many thanks Guillaume!

  • sergeitoom

    Hi, Marc. I think make Structuring of Information / Big Data / for the Understanding !

  • Akilade Ayotunde

    Here, I’ve met and interacted with people I could never have met in any other circumstances and I’ve been the richer for it.

  • wyatte

    On the app, the My Topics page has counters showing the number of new items, if any, waiting in each topic’s suggestion queue. On the website this fundamental feature is on the Dashboard page but not on the My Topics page. Don’t see why.

    • Guillaume Decugis

      Thanks for the feedback. Rationale is we try to avoid overwhelming pages with too much information but this might be more useful than others. Quick question: do you actually miss that on the profile page because you use it more than the dashboard @wyalurch:disqus?

      • wyatte

        Hi Guillaume. The My Topics page was my default for curating…my topics. Now I’m using Dashboard but only for the My Curated Topics menu. I’d consider un-nesting My Curated Topics to the home page; it’s a (small) drag having to go thru’ the menu each time to change topic when curating. Anyway, these are minor issues compared to the problem of the iOS-friendly fonts that are really awful on the website. Cheers, Jeff

  • gwynethannejones

    LOVE the new changes! Love the gamification leveling up with the awards (thanks for the 2 golds!)

    But I DO miss the black? Can I loan you some? Check out my blog, wiki, electronic portfolio – I have loads! It’s part of my branding! Can we customize that or shall I just get used to it? 😉

    Made sure to mention my love of you during the Global #RSCON4 conference last night – see?

    Cheers & thanks again!
    ~Gwyneth Jones
    The Daring Librarian (.com)

    • Guillaume Decugis

      Thanks for spreading the love @gwynethannejones:disqus ! And great to hear from you. Don’t worry: those of you Stones fan can still paint it black 😉 How? Just go to any of your topic, click Manage and then Customization: you can easily change the Background color to black. The rest of the site won’t be affected but your topics will have your own signature background.

  • benetel

    Est-il envisageable d’avoir ici une explication claire (en français si possible) concernant l’attribution des “médailles” sur ? Certains topics ont des médailles et moins de vues que d’autres pourtant non médaillés… J’avoue ne pas comprendre comment on peut être recommandé.Ca semble tenir du “club d’initiés”

  • Eric Chan Wei Chiang

    Some of my topics already have more than a thousand views but they are still not on any interests channels.

    Some curators with fewer views are already on interest channels. Is it because there were no recommendations by other curators?

    How do I get more recommendations? I have received quite a few thanks and have several accepted suggestions, do these count towards getting on interest channels? Are there other criterias such as number of scoops?

  • yustein

    This was a year ago, any improvements for me to come back as a customer?

  • Guillaume Decugis

    They need a account but it just takes a few clicks to sign up with Facebook, Twitter or email and be able to comment. So not longer than any other comment system.

Read previous post:
8 common mistakes in how our brains think and how to prevent them – – The Buffer Blog

What are the biggest thinking mistakes all of us do nearly every day? We've collected the 8 biggest thinking mistakes...